Spring-Weber v. City Of Chicago et al
Lisa Spring-Weber |
City Of Chicago, William Wong and Edgar Ignacio Silvestrini |
1:2016cv08097 |
August 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Matthew F. Kennelly |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/26/2018: For the reasons stated, the Court grants the defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 92] and directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. Mailed notice. (pjg, ) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 4/10/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion and order, the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss in part [dkt. no. 35]. Specifically, the Court dismisses count 4 as to all defendants to the extent that the claim is based on Spring's alleged confinement in the waiting room and retaliation for speaking with Alderman Burke. The Court also dismisses count 4 as to Dr. Wong and Sil vestrini to the extent it is based on allegations involving drug and psychiatric testing and signing the HIPAA release form. The Court otherwise denies defendants' motion to dismiss. Given the pendency of a motion to withdraw, plaintiff's attorney is directed to take steps to immediately transmit a copy of this decision to plaintiff. (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.