Kinzy et al v. Howard and Howard, PLLC et al
Plaintiff: Kinzy Kinzy and Jacki Kinzy
Defendant: Howard and Howard, PLLC, Fidelity National Law Group, Pierce and Associates, P.C. and First Tennessee Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2016cv08230
Filed: August 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/3/2019. The Court grants the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 56 , 58 , and 61 . All claims alleged in the complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(lk, )
January 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies Fidelity and Pierce's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer 17 , and grants Howard & Howard, First Tennessee, and Pierce's Motion to Stay 14 . This matter shall be stayed until a final judgment in Foreclosure Action is rendered. The parties also shall file a status report notifying the Court of the conclusion of State Foreclosure Action within seven days of the final disposition of that case. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/17/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kinzy et al v. Howard and Howard, PLLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kinzy Kinzy
Represented By: Kyle M. Kinzy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacki Kinzy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard and Howard, PLLC
Represented By: Daniel S. Rubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidelity National Law Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pierce and Associates, P.C.
Represented By: Brian R Merfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Tennessee Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Daniel S. Rubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?