Zoller et al v. UBS Securities LLC et al
||Shannon Zoller and Alexander Beigelman
||UBS Securities LLC, UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Americas Inc.
||December 12, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
||Milton I. Shadur
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 5, 2019
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/5/2019: For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the defendants' motion to compel arbitration [dkt. no. 25]. Because the plaintiffs' claims will proceed, if at all, in arbitration, the Court directs the Clerk to administratively terminate the case as a pending case. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
|March 19, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/19/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies UBS's motion to dismiss Beigelman's claims and to compel arbit ration of Zoller's claims [dkt. no. 25]. The Court also sees no appropriate basis to stay litigation of Beigelman's claims pending resolution of his arbitration. The case is set for a status hearing on April 3, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. to set a schedule for further proceedings. Counsel are directed to confer in advance of the status hearing to attempt to agree on a schedule to propose to the Court. (mk)
|August 24, 2017
MEMORANDUM Order issued regarding pending Motion 25 . Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/24/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?