Stovall v. Dart et al

Stovall v. Dart et al

Plaintiff:	Bernetta Stovall
Defendant:	Thomas Dart
Case Number:	1:2017cv03298
Filed:	May 1, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Milton I. Shadur
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 19, 2017	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM Order: On May 9, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that her failure to comply with the order by May 30, 2017, would result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff has failed to comply w ith this order. The Court's mail to Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable and Plaintiff has not provided a change of address. Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Federal Election Commission v. Al Salvi for Senate Committee, 205 F.3d 1015, 1018 (7th Cir. 2000) (court has authority both inherently and under Rule 41(b) to dismiss case as sanction for failure to prosecute and noncompliance with court order). As the original, r ejected complaint has become re-operative, Plaintiff is hereby assessed a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and Paul v. Marberry, 658 F.3d 702, 704-05 (7th Cir. 2011). Furthermore, having brought this action, Plaintiff nevertheless remains obligated to pay the full filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on June 19, 2017. Mailed notice (ph, )
May 9, 2017	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3 ) is granted on condition that she complies with the remaining directions in this paragraph. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejud ice to her submission of an amended complaint, and her failure to do so by May 30, 2017 will result in summary dismissal of this case. To enable her to comply with this memorandum order's directions, the Clerk is directed to send her an amend ed civil rights Complaint form with instructions, a blank Motion for Attorney Representation ("Motion"), a copy of this memorandum order and a blank USM-285 (United States Marshals Service) form. Meanwhile plaintiff's current Motion (Dkt. No. 4 ) is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on May 9, 2017. Mailed notice (ph, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 19, 2017

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM Order: On May 9, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that her failure to comply with the order by May 30, 2017, would result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff has failed to comply w ith this order. The Court's mail to Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable and Plaintiff has not provided a change of address. Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Federal Election Commission v. Al Salvi for Senate Committee, 205 F.3d 1015, 1018 (7th Cir. 2000) (court has authority both inherently and under Rule 41(b) to dismiss case as sanction for failure to prosecute and noncompliance with court order). As the original, r ejected complaint has become re-operative, Plaintiff is hereby assessed a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and Paul v. Marberry, 658 F.3d 702, 704-05 (7th Cir. 2011). Furthermore, having brought this action, Plaintiff nevertheless remains obligated to pay the full filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on June 19, 2017. Mailed notice (ph, )

May 9, 2017

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3 ) is granted on condition that she complies with the remaining directions in this paragraph. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejud ice to her submission of an amended complaint, and her failure to do so by May 30, 2017 will result in summary dismissal of this case. To enable her to comply with this memorandum order's directions, the Clerk is directed to send her an amend ed civil rights Complaint form with instructions, a blank Motion for Attorney Representation ("Motion"), a copy of this memorandum order and a blank USM-285 (United States Marshals Service) form. Meanwhile plaintiff's current Motion (Dkt. No. 4 ) is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on May 9, 2017. Mailed notice (ph, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stovall v. Dart et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernetta Stovall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Dart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?