Davis et al v. Actavis, Inc. et al
Douglas L Davis and Laura C. Davis |
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. |
1:2017cv03775 |
May 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Matthew F. Kennelly |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 148 MDL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 196 (Order on Plaintiffs' motion to exclude expert testimony, Defendants' motion to exclude expert testimony, and Defendants' motion for summary judgment in Davis v. Actavis, Inc., Case No. 17 C 3775), signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/1/2023. (mk) |
Filing 53 MDL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 179 (Memorandum Opinion and Order on Actavis, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment in Davis v. Actavis, Inc., Case No. 17 C 3775), signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/4/2020: For the reasons stated in th e accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies Actavis's motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 33]. The case is set for a telephone status hearing on November 23, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. to discuss further proceedings in this matter, us ing call-in number 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Counsel are directed to confer and are to file a joint status report on November 18, 2020 with an agreed-upon proposal for pretrial case management or, if they cannot agree, alternative proposals with a justification for each. (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.