Overwell Harvest, Limited v. Widerhorn et al
Plaintiff: Overwell Harvest, Limited
Defendant: David Widerhorn and Paul Giedraitis
Case Number: 1:2017cv06086
Filed: August 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge: Sara L. Ellis
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 300 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and Order, the Court denies in part, defers ruling in part, and grants in part Trading Technologies' motion to exclude expert testimony 258 . The Court denies Trading Techno logies' request to exclude Finnerty's valuation opinion. The Court defers ruling on Trading Technologies' request to exclude Finnerty's opinion regarding actions the Directors should have taken in connection with Neurensic's asset sale. The Court grants Trading Technologies' request to exclude Finnerty's opinion as to what Overwell would reasonably have bid on Neurensic's assets. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 12/2/2022. Mailed notice(rj, )
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 246 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and Order, the Court affirms its summary judgment ruling and denies Trading Technologies' motion for reconsideration 235 . Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 3/23/2022. Mailed notice(rj, )
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 233 OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 11/1/2021. Mailed notice(rj, )
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 126 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies Trading Technologies' motion to dismiss 102 , and the Court denies Giedraitis' motion to dismiss 106 . Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/9/2019: Mailed notice(rj, )
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 93 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies Giedraitis' motion to dismiss 77 and grants Trading Technologies' motion to dismiss 69 . Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 1/31/2019. Mailed notice(rj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Overwell Harvest, Limited v. Widerhorn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Overwell Harvest, Limited
Represented By: John Joseph Scharkey, III
Represented By: Zachary Michael Slavens
Represented By: Robert D. Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Widerhorn
Represented By: William Choslovsky
Represented By: Michael J. Neville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Giedraitis
Represented By: William Choslovsky
Represented By: Michael J. Neville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?