Bogan v. Lashbrook et al
Petitioner: Antonio M. Bogan
Respondent: Jacqueline Lashbrook
Case Number: 1:2017cv07294
Filed: October 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Jorge L. Alonso
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Bogan's habeas corpus petition 1 is denied on the merits. The Clerk is instructed to enter a judgment in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Any pending motions are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/14/2019. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bogan v. Lashbrook et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio M. Bogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jacqueline Lashbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?