Dixon v. The Washington and Jane Smith Community-Beverly et al
| Cynthia Dixon |
| The Washington and Jane Smith Community-Beverly, Kevin McGee, Kronos, Inc. and Marti Jatis |
| 1:2017cv08033 |
| November 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/31/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies plaintiff's motion to remand [dkt. no. 27] and denies Kronos' s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, strike plaintiff's request for liquidated damages [dkt. no. 16]. On the Smith defendants' motion to dismiss, the Court dismisses Smith Village and Smith Crossing as defendants with respect to all counts of the complaint; dismisses counts 3 through 5 as against McGee and Jatis without prejudice; dismisses Dixon's retaliatory discharge claim (count 6); and otherwise denies the motion [dkt. no. 19]. The case is set for a status hearing on June 7, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. for the purpose of setting a discovery and pretrial schedule and discussing the possibility of settlement. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
