Epic Fresh Produce, LLC v. Olympic Wholesale Produce, Inc., et al.
Epic Fresh Produce, LLC |
Olympic Wholesale Produce, Inc. and Nicholas Doumouras |
Prime Legal, LLC |
1:2017cv08381 |
November 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Robert M. Dow |
Agricultural Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 287 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 12/18/2018. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Epic Fresh Produce, LLC's ("Epic") Motion for Ruling on Objections of the Olympic Defendants to Plaint iffs' Supplemental Claims and the PACA Trust Chart 248 . Epic's motion seeks the determination of what claims Epic, Kiko's Produce, Inc. ("Kiko's), Twin Garden Sales, Inc. ("TGS"), Classic Fruit Company, Inc. ("Classic Fruit"), Tom Lange Company, Inc. ("TLC"), and Couture Farms ("Couture") (each individually a "PACA Claimant" and collectively "the PACA Claimants") may pursue under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act. Plaintiff's motion 248 is granted and the basis for the Court's rulings is set out below. The case is set for further status on January 15, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice(cdh, ) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 12/7/2017. Mailed notice(ber, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.