Jefferson v. Metra

Jefferson v. Metra

Plaintiff:	Jetun Jefferson
Defendant:	Metra
Case Number:	1:2017cv09070
Filed:	December 18, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Sharon Johnson Coleman
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 31, 2018	Filing 39 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The defendant's motion to dismiss 23 , which this Court construes as a partial motion to dismiss in light of the omission of Jefferson's retaliation claim, is therefore granted. Jefferson's claims of age discrimination, disability discrimination, and race discrimination are dismissed without prejudice. Jefferson's retaliation claim remains. The Court grants Jefferson 28 days in which to seek leave to file an amended complaint. The Court enco urages Jefferson to file an amended complaint setting forth in more detail the protected activities that he believes gave rise to the retaliation against him. The Court also invites Jefferson to attempt to amend his complaint by curing the deficienci es identified in his race discrimination, age discrimination, and disability discrimination claims. If a motion for leave to file an amended complaint is not timely filed, this action will proceed based solely on Jefferson's retaliation claim as it has been previously pled. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 10/31/2018. Mailed notice. (ym, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 31, 2018

Filing 39 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The defendant's motion to dismiss 23 , which this Court construes as a partial motion to dismiss in light of the omission of Jefferson's retaliation claim, is therefore granted. Jefferson's claims of age discrimination, disability discrimination, and race discrimination are dismissed without prejudice. Jefferson's retaliation claim remains. The Court grants Jefferson 28 days in which to seek leave to file an amended complaint. The Court enco urages Jefferson to file an amended complaint setting forth in more detail the protected activities that he believes gave rise to the retaliation against him. The Court also invites Jefferson to attempt to amend his complaint by curing the deficienci es identified in his race discrimination, age discrimination, and disability discrimination claims. If a motion for leave to file an amended complaint is not timely filed, this action will proceed based solely on Jefferson's retaliation claim as it has been previously pled. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 10/31/2018. Mailed notice. (ym, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jefferson v. Metra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jetun Jefferson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Metra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?