Moreno v. Progistics Distribution, Inc.

Plaintiff: Karina Moreno
Defendant: Progistics Distribution Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01833
Filed: March 13, 2018
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 2, 2018 26 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Progistic's motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings 19 is granted. The parties should provide the Court with a written status report on or before 10/31/2018 advising the Court as to the status of arbitration proceedings. A status hearing is set for 11/2/2018 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/2/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moreno v. Progistics Distribution, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karina Moreno
Represented By: Martin K. Denis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progistics Distribution Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?