Lockhart v. Baldwin et al
| Ian Lockhart |
| John R Baldwin, Randy S. Pfister, Debbie Knauer, Charles F Best, Barea V. Miggins, Clemons, Taylor, Sean P. Furlow and Jane & John Does |
| 1:2018cv04193 |
| June 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 1/18/2024.For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' second motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 145 ) is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing
2
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/15/2018. The clerk is directed to open a new case, severing plaintiff's claims against Stateville defendants John R. Baldwin, Randy S. Pfister, Debbie Knauer, Charles F. Best, Barea V . Miggins, Clemons, Taylor, Sean P. Furlow, and Jane & John Does. Clerk is directed to file a copy of Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) and a copy of this Order under the new case number. Clerk is further directed to transfer the new case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for whatever action(s) the transferee court deems appropriate.(LN, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 6/15/2018.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
