Grobe v. AbbVie Inc. et al
| Mark Grobe |
| AbbVie Products LLC, Abbott Laboratories, Actavis Pharma Inc., Anda Inc., AbbVie Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT Inc., UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, Besins Healthcare Inc., Actavis Inc., Besins Healthcare S.A., Besins Healthcare, Inc and Besins Healthcare, S.A. |
| 1:2018cv05466 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 18cv5466 Grobe v. AbbVie Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2545 ) (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Grobe by Michael Joseph Quillin (Quillin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mark Grobe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14810093. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quillin, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (jn, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants identified in Paragraph 12 of the Master Short-Form Complaint. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
