Roberts v. United States Parole Commission
Maurice Roberts |
United States Parole Commission; United States Department of the Army, Disciplinary Barracks, United States Department of the Army and United States Parole Commission |
1:2018cv06188 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jorge L Alonso |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PAYMENT of Filing fee $ 5.00 Receipt # 4624213381. (nsf, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Petitioner is given until November 12, 2018, to either pay the $5 filing fee or file a petition for leave to file in forma pauperis. Petitioner is warned that the Court may dismiss this case if he fails to comply with this order. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 10/17/2018. Mailed notice (nsf, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (jn, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Maurice Roberts by Amanda Gabriela Penabad (Penabad, Amanda) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Penabad, Amanda) |
Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Maurice Roberts against, United States Parole Commission; United States Department of the Army, Disciplinary Barracks (Penabad, Amanda) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 9/10/2018 (ph, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.