Tipton v. Lashbrook
Petitioner: Darnell Tipton
Respondent: J. Lashbrook
Case Number: 1:2018cv06189
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Filing 11 ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice (nsf, )
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: This case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as an unauthorized and successive habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. 2244(b). The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Petitioner's motions to raise issues that were not raised before, #8 and #9 , are denied as moot. The Clerk shall update the docket to reflect that: (1) Petitioner is now incarcerated at the Menard Correctional Center and adjust his address on the docket accordingly; and, (2) Respondent is Jacqueline Lashbrook, Warden, Menard Correctional Center. Enter judgment and terminate civil case. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 10/17/2018. Mailed notice (nsf, )
October 17, 2018 ***Civil Case Terminated. (psm, )
October 10, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION by Petitioner Darnell Tipton, issues never raise at first trial or on appeal new evidence & facts (Envelope postmark 10/01/2018). (jk, )
September 27, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION by Petitioner Darnell Tipton illegal sentence of 60 years (Exhibit) (Envelope postmark 9/27/2018) (Linked document contains incorrect case number) (Received for docketing 10/01/2018) (bg, )
September 10, 2018 Filing 7 MAILED Prisoner Local Rule 83.15 Letter to Darnell Tipton. (mma, )
September 10, 2018 Filing 6 RECEIVED from Illinois Southern; Case Number 3:18-cv-01690 (mma)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to Northern District of Illinois. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/7/2018. (tjk) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 9/10/2018.]
September 6, 2018 Filing 4 Letter to petitioner regarding case opening. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge, #2 Motion and Affidavit to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs) (tkm) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 9/10/2018.]
September 6, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION New Issues, New Evidence, Facts by Darnell Tipton. (tkm) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 9/10/2018.]
September 6, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Darnell Tipton. (tkm) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 9/10/2018.]
September 6, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Darnell Tipton.(tkm) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 9/10/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tipton v. Lashbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darnell Tipton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Lashbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?