The City of Chicago v. Sessions III

Plaintiff: The City of Chicago
Defendant: Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Case Number: 1:2018cv06859
Filed: October 12, 2018
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:702
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
October 12, 2018 SUMMONS Issued as to Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, and U.S. Attorney(pj, )
October 12, 2018 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Scott Douglas Spears (Spears, Scott)
October 12, 2018 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Laura A Kleinman (Kleinman, Laura)
October 12, 2018 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Harnaik Singh Kahlon (Kahlon, Harnaik)
October 12, 2018 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Matthew Charles Crowl (Crowl, Matthew)
October 12, 2018 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Ronald S. Safer (Safer, Ronald)
October 12, 2018 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15054641. (Jennings, Molly)
October 12, 2018 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15054481. (Savitzky, Ari)
October 12, 2018 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15054436. (Holtzblatt, Ari)
October 12, 2018 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15054293. (Adegbile, Debo)
October 12, 2018 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15054037. (Gorelick, Jamie)
October 12, 2018 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15053933. (Ogden, David)
October 12, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. (pj, )
October 12, 2018 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Justin Anthony Houppert (Houppert, Justin)
October 12, 2018 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The City of Chicago by Edward N Siskel (Siskel, Edward)
October 12, 2018 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Siskel, Edward)
October 12, 2018 3 NOTICE by The City of Chicago of Claims of Unconstitutionality (Siskel, Edward)
October 12, 2018 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Siskel, Edward)
October 12, 2018 1 COMPLAINT filed by The City of Chicago; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15052376. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Siskel, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The City of Chicago v. Sessions III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The City of Chicago
Represented By: Ronald S. Safer
Represented By: Scott Douglas Spears
Represented By: Harnaik Singh Kahlon
Represented By: Laura A Kleinman
Represented By: Justin Anthony Houppert
Represented By: Edward N Siskel
Represented By: Matthew Charles Crowl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?