Johnson v. Shaw et al
| David Johnson |
| Officer McHugh, Officer Shaw, Officer Stoch, Officer Bryice, Officer Harvey, Sergeant Rodgers, Officer Lenoir and Officer Lyday |
| 1:2018cv06935 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff David Johnson to Reconsider to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Envelope postmarked 11/26/18) (lf, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. Plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. Failure to remit the filing fee by 12/7/2018 will result in summary dismissal of this case. See Local Rule 3.3(e) (N.D. Ill.). The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 at this time. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on November 9, 2018. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff David Johnson for attorney representation (Exhibits). (lf, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff David Johnson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (lf, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (lf, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by David Johnson (Exhibits). (Envelope not postmarked) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
