Mitchell v. LCSA Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Customer Service et al
| Clarence H. Mitchell |
| California Department of Child Support Services and LCSA Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Customer Service |
| 1:2018cv07356 |
| November 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice(smm, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER: The amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice to litigation in a forum having jurisdiction over this claim. Motions for attorney representation and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [10, 11] are stricken as moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 11/28/2018. Mailed notice (smm)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Clarence H. Mitchell for attorney representation. (smm, ) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Clarence H. Mitchell for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm, ) |
| Filing 9 JURY Demand. (smm, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 and his motion for attorney representation #5 are denied as incomplete. His complaint is stricken for the reasons stated herein. Should he elect to proceed with this lawsuit, Plaintiff is directed within 21 days to submit an amended complaint and to pay the filing fee in full or submit an amended application. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 11/6/2018. Mailed notice (smm) Modified on 11/9/2018 (td, ).
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Clarence H. Mitchell for attorney representation. (smm) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Clarence H. Mitchell for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Clarence H. Mitchell. (smm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Clarence H. Mitchell. (smm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. LCSA Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Customer Service et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clarence H. Mitchell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: California Department of Child Support Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LCSA Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Customer Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
