McNichol v. Aurora Bank, FSB et al
| Duane E. McNichol |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and Aurora Bank, FSB |
| 1:2018cv08351 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Misty L. Peterson (Peterson, Misty) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Tameika L. Montgomery (Montgomery, Tameika) |
| Filing 12 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services, LLC (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC(Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Mary Kathryn Curry (Curry, Mary) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Duane E. McNichol as to Aurora Bank, FSB on 1/18/2019, answer due 2/8/2019. (Sulaiman, Omar) |
| ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant Aurora Bank, FSB. (pj, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Duane E. McNichol as to Equifax Information Services, LLC on 1/7/2019, answer due 1/28/2019. (Sulaiman, Omar) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 4/12/2019 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) planning report re MIDP due 4/9/2019. The report must comply with the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Aurora Bank, FSB and Equifax Information Services, LLC. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Duane E. McNichol by Alexander James Taylor (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Duane E. McNichol by Marwan R. Daher (Daher, Marwan) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Duane E. McNichol by Omar Tayseer Sulaiman (Sulaiman, Omar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Duane E. McNichol; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15301531. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sulaiman, Omar) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
