Brown v. Pfister et al
| Marcus Brown |
| Randy Pfister |
| 1:2018cv08421 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 19 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff having shown that he did not intentionally deceive the Court with respect to his litigation history and strike-out status, the order to show cause is discharged. However, because Plaintiff has struck out under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and this case does not involve imminent danger of serious physical injury, his renewed request to waive prepayment of the filing fee is denied. The Court has no discretion to grant Plaintiff in forma pauperis under the circumstances of this case. On the Court's own motion, Plaintiff is granted an extension of time until March 1, 2019, to pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. Failure to pay the $400.00 filing fee by the deadline will result in summary dismissal of this case. Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/22/2019. Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Marcus Brown good cause, MOTION by Plaintiff Marcus Brown for reconsideration (Exhibits). (kp, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff having "struck out" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. Plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. In addition, Plaintiff is ordered to show good cause in writing why the Court should not summarily dismiss this case in view of his failure to disclose his prior litigation. Failure to (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee and (2) show cause by February 18, 2019, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court at this time defers ruling on Plaintiffs motion for attorney representation #6 . Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/4/2019. Mailed notice (cc, )
|
| Filing 8 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Marcus Brown for attorney representation (Exhibits) (cc, ) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of law by Marcus Brown in support of plaintiff complaint #1 . (cc, ) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Marcus Brown in support of motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 . (cc, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Marcus Brown for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (cc, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (cc, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Marcus Brown (Exhibits) (cc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Pfister et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Randy Pfister | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marcus Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
