Bucon v. Berryhill
Adam Bucon |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
1:2019cv00925 |
February 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Young B Kim |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government is directed to file the administrative record by May 10, 2019. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by July 12, 2019. The government's response and/or cross-motion for summary judgment is due by September 13, 2019. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, she may file a reply brief by September 27, 2019, but one is not required. Mailed notice (ma,) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 3/13/2019. (ph, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing set for 3/26/2019 is stricken. Executive Committee Order to follow. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Nigel B Cooney as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 3/26/2019 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Adam Bucon by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adam Bucon; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15484878. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bucon v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adam Bucon | |
Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
Represented By: | Nigel B Cooney |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.