Global Merchandising Services Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD. |
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" |
1:2019cv01221 |
February 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the case is dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing of 04/11/2019 is vacated. Civil case terminated.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Global Merchandising Services Ltd. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's extension motion #21 on the TRO is granted to 04/11/2019, in light of the same circumstances that justified the initial issuance and the need to accomplish the goals of the first TRO. The status hearing of 04/01/2019 is reset to 04/11/2019 at 8:30 a.m., with the motion for preliminary injunction due by 04/08/2019, and noticed for that same date and time. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 23 STATUS Report by Global Merchandising Services Ltd. (Bu, Yi) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of extension of time #21 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 3/28/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 21 MOTION by Plaintiff Global Merchandising Services Ltd. for extension of time (Vogt, Keith) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" (lma, ) |
Filing 20 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, the motion for TRO is granted. This is the redacted public version. The Court notes that the declaration filed by Plaintiff was executed by Thomas Schlegel, an outside attorney for Plaintiff. It is unusual for an evidentiary declaration to be filed by an attorney, especially an outside attorney, because it puts the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrines at risk. Plaintiff might wish to consider a different affiant in the future. Also, future proposed orders must incorporate a listing of the trademarks themselves into the order, including images of logos if applicable. Rule 65 generally requires that recipients know precisely what is enjoined without having to look at any separate document (such as Exhibit 1 to Schlegel's declaration).Emailed notice(slb, ) |
Filing 19 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, the motion for TRO is granted. This is the under seal version. The Court notes that the declaration filed by Plaintiff was executed by Thomas Schlegel, an outside attorney for Plaintiff. It is unusual for an evidentiary declaration to be filed by an attorney, especially an outside attorney, because it puts the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrines at risk. Plaintiff might wish to consider a different affiant in the future. Also, future proposed orders must incorporate a listing of the trademarks themselves into the order, including images of logos if applicable. Rule 65 generally requires that recipients know precisely what is enjoined without having to look at any separate document (such as Exhibit 1 to Schlegel's declaration). (slb, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Motion hearing held on Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and other relief 13 . Plaintiff's motion for leave to file documents under seal #11 is granted. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess brief #12 is granted. For the reasons stated in open court and in the order to be docketed, Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and other relief 13 is granted. The temporary restraining order will be entered in a separate entry: there will be a temporarily sealed version and a publicly available redacted version. Plaintiff's motion to serve Defendants by electronic means 13 is granted. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery is granted. The motion for renewal of the TRO or a motion for preliminary injunction to be noticed for 04/01/2019, but shall be filed by 03/26/2019. The status hearing of 04/04/2019 is reset to 04/01/2019 at 9:30 a.m. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the Court's own initiative, the motion hearing at 8:30 a.m. is reset to 9:15 a.m. on the same date, 03/14/2019. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 16 Notice of Motion for presentment of #11 #12 13 NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for leave to file #11 , motion for leave to file excess pages #12 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 3/14/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 15 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Global Merchandising Services Ltd. Sealed Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Thomas Schlegel regarding memorandum in support of motion #14 (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 13 EX PARTE MOTION (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-6 to Declaration of KVogt, #3 Declaration of Thomas Schlegel, #4 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of TSchlegel)(Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Global Merchandising Services Ltd. for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Global Merchandising Services Ltd. for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 10 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Global Merchandising Services Ltd. Schedule A to Complaint (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
Filing 8 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials(ek, ) |
Filing 7 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(ek, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 04/04/2019 at 10:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD. by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD. by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD. by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15497739. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Vogt, Keith) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Global Merchandising Services Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD. | |
Represented By: | Yanling Jiang |
Represented By: | Keith A. Vogt |
Represented By: | Yi Bu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.