Rivers v. Apple, Inc.
| Monica Rivers |
| Apple, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01520 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Apple Inc. c/o Lin Zhu on 3/19/2019 by Plaintiff Monica Rivers. Waiver of service due by 4/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Waiver of the Service of Summons Form AO 399)(Pietrucha, Cynthia) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Initial status hearing set for 5/7/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Monica Rivers by Cynthia Nicole Pietrucha (Pietrucha, Cynthia) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Supplement Attorney Appearance Form)(Pietrucha, Cynthia) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Monica Rivers; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15545757.(Pietrucha, Cynthia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivers v. Apple, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monica Rivers | |
| Represented By: | Cynthia Nicole Pietrucha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
