Baylom v. Kohn Law Firm, S.C. et al
| Darwin Baylom |
| Kohn Law Firm, S.C. and Unifund CCR Partners |
| 1:2019cv01880 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Darwin Baylom WITHOUT prejudice as to all Defendants (McGarry, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Status hearing set for 7/23/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 5 Notice of Settlement by Darwin Baylom as to all Defendants (McGarry, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Darwin Baylom. All Defendants. (McGarry, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Darwin Baylom by Daniel John McGarry (McGarry, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (McGarry, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darwin Baylom; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15606243. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(McGarry, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
