Manik v. Boeing Co., The
Plaintiff: Dewi Marlina Manik
Defendant: Boeing Co., The
Case Number: 1:2019cv01932
Filed: March 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Durkin
Referring Judge: Virginia M Kendall
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Airplane Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: The Court orders all individual related actions, 19 C 1626, 19 C 1600, 19 C 1623, 19 C 1550, 19 C 1552, 19 C 1553, 19 C 1598, 19 C 1554, 19 C 1558, 19 C 1601, 19 C 1712, 19 C 1698, 19 C 1695, 19 C 1697, 19 C 1701, 19 C 1703, 19 C 1715, 19 C 1625, 19 C 1714, 19 C 1992, 19 C 1932, 19 C 1935, 19 C 1924, 19 C 1951, and 19 C 1624 to be consolidated under case number 18 C 7686, to be captioned "I re Lion Air Flight JT 610 Crash." This order will be implemented by the Clerk of Court submitting JS-6 forms to the Administrative Office for the individual related actions. This will designate the individual related actions as closed for administrative and statistical purposes. This order will not be considered a dismissal or disposition of these actions on the merits. All future pleadings are to be filed in the consolidated case alone. No pleadings should be filed in any of the individual related actions which are to be administratively closed. Any additional related cases filed in the future and assigned to Judge Durkin will also be administratively closed and consolidated with this case. Should any party believe at any point in the future that separate proceedings have become necessary for that party's particular claims, the party should make a motion in the consolidated case 18 C 7686 seeking relief. The Clerk is also directed to transfer all attorney appearances in the individual related actions to 18 C 7686. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/16/2019. Mailed notice (cc, )
April 4, 2019 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dewi Marlina Manik by KRISTINA MARIE INFANTE (INFANTE, KRISTINA)
April 2, 2019 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dewi Marlina Manik by Steven C. Marks (Marks, Steven)
April 1, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Motion to appear pro hac vice #8 is granted; Attorney Kristina Infante for Dewi Manik added.Mailed notice (srn, )
March 28, 2019 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Motion to appear pro hac vice #6 is granted; Attorney Steven Marks foe Dewi Manik added.Mailed notice (srn, )
March 26, 2019 Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings. Honorable Virginia M. Kendall no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Executive Committee on 3/26/2019. (sxb, )
March 25, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15629852. (INFANTE, KRISTINA)
March 22, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service Notice of Related Actions by Sarah Elizabeth Buck on behalf of Dewi Marlina Manik (Buck, Sarah)
March 22, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15625306. (Marks, Steven)
March 22, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Boeing Co., The (pj, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, )
March 20, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dewi Marlina Manik by Sarah Elizabeth Buck (Buck, Sarah)
March 20, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dewi Marlina Manik by Andrew T. Hays (Hays, Andrew)
March 20, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hays, Andrew)
March 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dewi Marlina Manik; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15617794. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Appointing Special Administrator)(Hays, Andrew)
March 20, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manik v. Boeing Co., The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dewi Marlina Manik
Represented By: Andrew T. Hays
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Buck
Represented By: KRISTINA MARIE INFANTE
Represented By: Steven C. Marks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boeing Co., The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?