Skiba v. Public Law Board 6990 et al
Mark Skiba |
Anissa Black, Allison Parker, Public Law Board 6990, Charlotte Gold, TCU Union Industrial Director, Illinois Central Railroad, Transportation Communications International Union, Clark, Ricevuto, Allison Parker nee Dillon, Officer Cortez, Roop, Black, Miller, Townsend and Leorop |
1:2019cv02267 |
April 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Labor: Railway Labor Act |
45 U.S.C. § 151 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 NOTICE of Motion by Elizabeth A. Roma for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #21 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/18/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 21 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Respondent Allison Parker nee Dillon Petitioner's Amended Complaint (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 20 AMENDED Petition for Judicial Review by Mark Skiba against Illinois Central Railroad, Townsend, Roop, Miller, Ricevuto, Leorop, Clark, Cortez, Black and terminating Public Law Board 6990 ((Voting Member) ), TCU Union Industrial Director, Transportation Communications International Union, Anissa Black (Illinois Central Railroad, PLB 6990 Board Member ) and Charlotte Gold (self-employed, referee) (Exhibits) (nsf, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Respondent Illinois Central Railroad. (ec, ) |
Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, naming all defendants and containing a concise statement of his claims, by 6/25/19. Upon filing the amended complaint, the Clerk is directed to issue summons to each defendant and provide them to plaintiff via his email address listed on the court's docket. Defendant's motion to dismiss #12 is will be terminated after the amended complaint is filed. Defendant's motion to stay #14 is denied as moot. This case is removed from the MIDP. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to complete service of summons #17 is terminated as moot, and the court grants plaintiff until 8/26/19 to serve all defendants named in the amended complaint. The court will issue a further order once service is made and defendants appear. The status hearing on 6/20/19 is stricken and no appearance is necessary. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 18 ALIAS Summons Issued as to Respondents Anissa Black, Illinois Central Railroad, Transportation Communications International Union. (ek, ) |
Filing 17 MOTION by Petitioner Mark Skiba for extension of time to serve alias summons. (Exhibits). (psm, ) |
Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Hearing on the motions to dismiss #12 and to stay #14 is stricken and reset to 6/4/19 at 9:45 a.m. No appearance on 5/30/19 is necessary. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (pj, ) |
ALIAS Summons Issued as to Respondent Charlotte Gold. (pj, ) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Elizabeth A. Roma for presentment of motion to stay #14 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 5/30/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Respondent Allison Parker to stay and Relief of Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Elizabeth A. Roma for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #12 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 5/30/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Respondent Allison Parker (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Allison Parker by Patrick Edward Deady (Deady, Patrick) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Allison Parker by Maria Antonia Bird (Bird, Maria Antonia) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Allison Parker by Elizabeth A. Roma (Roma, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 LETTER from Charlotte Gold dated 04/12/2019. (Envelope postmarked on 04/12/2019). (jjr, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 6/20/19 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Respondents Anissa Black, Charlotte Gold, Allison Parker (yap, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Petitioner Mark Skiba. (yap, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (yap, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mark Skiba (Attachments). (yap, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.