Cardona v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Bernardo Cardona
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv02367
Filed: April 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2019 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: A notice of voluntary dismissal has been filed. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i). All pending dates and motions are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
April 29, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bernardo Cardona (Chatman, Celetha)
April 24, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling Conference set for 7/24/2019 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) planning report re MIDP due 7/19/2019. The report must comply with the requirements of the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg)
April 10, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (mc, )
April 8, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, )
April 8, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bernardo Cardona by Celetha Chatman (Chatman, Celetha)
April 8, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bernardo Cardona by Michael Jacob Wood (Wood, Michael)
April 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bernardo Cardona ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15687733. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit s A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wood, Michael)
April 8, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cardona v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernardo Cardona
Represented By: Michael Jacob Wood
Represented By: Celetha Chatman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?