Cole v. The Money Source et al
| Victoria Cole |
| Thomas Leitner, The Money Source and United States of America c/o HUD |
| 1:2019cv03219 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Status hearing held and continued to 8/8/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff failed to appear. If Plaintiff would like to pursue this case, Plaintiff shall file an appearance or before 7/26/2019. Plaintiff is warned that failure without good cause to appear for the 8/8/2019 status hearing, or any future status or motion hearing, will result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice for want of prosecution. The AUSA shall send a copy of today's notice to Plaintiffs counsel.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Money Source by Paul Daniel Brask (Brask, Paul) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Status hearing held and continued to 7/10/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by United States of America c/o HUD(DeCelles, David) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 6/17/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Motion of HUD to extend time to answer or otherwise plead #6 is granted. The time for Defendant HUD to respond to the complaint is extended to 6/12/2019. Motion hearing set for 5/22/2019 at 9:00 a.m. #7 is stricken. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by David Harold DeCelles for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #6 before Honorable Gary Feinerman on 5/22/2019 at 09:00 AM. (DeCelles, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant United States of America c/o HUD for extension of time to file answer regarding notice of removal #1 (DeCelles, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 4 MAILED NOTICE of Removal Letter to Counsel of Record. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (DeCelles, David) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION of David Harold DeCelles as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States of America c/o HUD (DeCelles, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Kane County, case number (19 CH 81) filed by United States of America c/o HUD (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Notice of Filing)(DeCelles, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
