Willingham v. Stone Eye Center
| Gene Willingham |
| Stone Eye Center |
| 1:2019cv03256 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff has submitted a complaint without paying the filing fee. The court assumes plaintiff seeks in forma pauperis status and as such, reviews the complaint under 18 USC s. 1915(e)(2) and the court's independent obligation to review the case for jurisdiction. Plaintiff's complaint appears to allege a medical malpractice claim against a private entity. There is no plausible allegation of a violation of federal rights by a state actor, and no apparent basis to conclude that this court has jurisdiction over a state-law claim for malpractice. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a federal claim for relief, and without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction over state-law claims. Plaintiff may attempt to pursue malpractice claims in state court. The motion for attorney representation #3 is denied as moot. Enter judgment and terminate civil case. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Gene Willingham for attorney representation. (smm, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copies by Gene Willingham. (smm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Willingham v. Stone Eye Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gene Willingham | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stone Eye Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
