Johnson v. Saul
Mary M. Johnson |
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul |
1:2019cv03429 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Robert Blakey |
Sheila M Finnegan |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sheila Finnegan, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Robert Blakey on 06/25/2019. (mma, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge #8 , this case is transferred to the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Any pending deadlines or hearings before Judge Blakey are stricken. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Nigel B Cooney as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 7/3/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 6/24/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Additionally, the parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Should the parties elect to do so, they should notify Ms. Lewis, and the case will be reassigned upon receipt of the signed consent form. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mary M. Johnson by Justin Roger Poh (Poh, Justin) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mary M. Johnson by Joseph Stephen Sellers (Sellers, Joseph) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mary M. Johnson by Deborah Susan Spector (Spector, Deborah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spector, Deborah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nancy A. Berryhill; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15851901.(Spector, Deborah) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.