Allen v. Aerotek, Inc.
| Keisha Allen |
| Aerotek, Inc., and Aerotek, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03485 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew L. Scroggins for presentment of motion to compel #12 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 7/22/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM by Aerotek, Inc. in support of motion to compel #12 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Phaedra Marsha)(Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Aerotek, Inc. to compel arbitration and dismiss complaint with prejudice (Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Defendants (Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Unopposed motion for extension of time to 7/12/2019 to answer #8 is granted. Scheduling conference re MIDP previously set for 8/30/2019 to stand. Mailed notice (reg) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew L. Scroggins for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 6/21/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Aerotek, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Joint) (Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Aerotek, Inc. by Andrew L. Scroggins (Scroggins, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keisha Allen as to Aerotek, Inc. on 5/30/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. (Weiss, Jillian) Modified on 6/13/2019 (tt, ). |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 8/30/2019 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) report re MIDP due 8/27/2019. The report must comply with the requirements of the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Aerotek, Inc. (rc, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keisha Allen by Jillian Todd Weiss (Weiss, Jillian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Weiss, Jillian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Keisha Allen; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15860808.(Weiss, Jillian) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
