Cunningham v. Intelemedia Communications, Inc. et al
| Craig Cunningham |
| John Doe Allstate Agency, The Allstate Corporation, Intelemedia Premier Leads LLC and Intelemedia Communications, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03713 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER: Francis Nolan's and Matthew McCue's motions for leave to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiff #22 , #23 are granted. Defendants' motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #19 is granted. Defendants' responsive pleadings are due by 8/19/19. The Court strikes the status date set for 8/1/19 and resets it to 9/10/19 at 9:30 a.m. with the initial status report due by 8/29/19. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 7/31/2019. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 23 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16089310. (Mccue, Matthew) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16086011. (Nolan, Francis) |
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Allstate Corporation by Robert Dewit Owen (Owen, Robert) |
| Filing 20 (Agreed) NOTICE of Motion by Debra Rae Bernard for presentment of extension of time, #19 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 8/1/2019 at 01:45 PM. (Bernard, Debra) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Defendants Intelemedia Communications, Inc., Intelemedia Premier Leads LLC for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and to Reschedule Initial Status Report and Status Hearing (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Debra Bernard)(Bernard, Debra) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Defendants' motions for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #10 , #15 are granted. Defendants' responsive pleadings are due by 7/29/19. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Cunningham as to The Allstate Corporation on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 16 Agreed NOTICE of Motion by Lewis S. Wiener for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #15 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 7/2/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Wiener, Lewis) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant The Allstate Corporation for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or otherwise response (agreed and unopposed) (Wiener, Lewis) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Allstate Corporation by Lewis S. Wiener (Wiener, Lewis) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Cunningham as to Intelemedia Communications, Inc. on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Cunningham as to Intelemedia Premier Leads LLC on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 11 Agreed NOTICE of Motion by Debra Rae Bernard for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #10 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 7/2/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Bernard, Debra) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Intelemedia Communications, Inc. for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond (Agreed) (Bernard, Debra) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 8/1/2019 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 7/25/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Intelemedia Communications, Inc. by Debra Rae Bernard (Bernard, Debra) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Craig Cunningham by Anthony Paronich (Paronich, Anthony) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Craig Cunningham by Jonathan Patrick Misny (Misny, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Craig Cunningham by Lauren E. Urban (Urban, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Craig Cunningham by Brian Kevin Murphy (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint filed by Craig Cunningham; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15891562.(Murphy, Brian) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Intelemedia Communications, Inc., Intelemedia Premier Leads LLC, The Allstate Corporation. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
