Frick v. Karayannides et al
| Cary J Frick |
| Demetrios Karayannides and Karay Metals Incorporated |
| 1:2019cv04222 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendants' unopposed extension motion #13 to answer or respond is granted to 09/06/2019. The initial status hearing of 08/12/2019 is reset to 09/19/2019 at 9:30 a.m., with the joint initial status report due by 09/11/2019. The Court reminds the parties of the requirement in R. 8. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Max A Stein for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #13 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 8/7/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Stein, Max) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendants Karay Metals Incorporated, Demetrios Karayannides for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Stein, Max) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Karay Metals Incorporated, Demetrios Karayannides by Lauren Elizabeth Dreifus (Dreifus, Lauren) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Karay Metals Incorporated, Demetrios Karayannides by Max A Stein (Stein, Max) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cary J Frick as to Demetrios Karayannides on 7/12/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. (Siegel, Marc) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cary J Frick as to Karay Metals Incorporated on 7/12/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. (Siegel, Marc) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Upon review of the complaint, the Court orders the following jurisdictional inquiry. Defendant relies on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332, for subject matter jurisdiction. Compl. para. 7. The complaint alleges Defendant Karayannides's citizenship solely "on information and belief." Compl. para. 6. Citizenship must be proven by underlying facts, not just alleged on information and belief. See America's Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992). The Complaint supplies some facts that might support the citizenship allegations, but the parties' counsel (including Defendants' counsel after service of process) must address the citizenship issue in the joint status report filed in advance of the initial status hearing. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 08/12/2019 at 9 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Karay Metals Incorporated, Demetrios Karayannides (ec, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cary J Frick by James D Rogers (Rogers, James) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cary J Frick by Bradley S Manewith (Manewith, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cary J Frick by Marc J. Siegel (Siegel, Marc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Siegel, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Cary J Frick; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15960983.(Siegel, Marc) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ecw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
