Baine v Barr et al
| Leon Baine |
| Brendan Kelly, Attorney General William Barr, US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Regina Lombardo, JB Pritzker, US Department of Justice, United States of America, The United States Department of Justice, The United States of America, William Barr and The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives |
| 1:2019cv04950 |
| July 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Status hearing held. Timothy Clark appeared by telephone on behalf of Plaintiff and that service went out yesterday as to all federal Defendants by certified mail as required by Rule 4. On the State of Illinois, the Court directed Plaintiff to double-check how to serve Illinois in a way that is more efficient than personal service on the chief executive. Status hearing set for 10/31/2019 at 9:30 a.m.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 5 STATUS Report by Leon Baine (Clark, Timothy) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Brendan Kelly, JB Pritzker (mc, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to William Barr, Regina Lombardo, The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The United States Department of Justice and The United States of America (mc, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Initial status hearing set for 09/06/2019 at 9:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Clark, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Leon Baine; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16061473.(Clark, Timothy) |
| ENTERED IN ERROR |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
