Weston v. Dyson
| Nicole Weston |
| Joycelyn Dyson |
| 1:2019cv05164 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the Courtroom Deputy on 9/13/19.Mailed notice(ca, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Plaintiff submitted an application for leave to proceed IFP in this case #4 . On August 12, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff's IFP application, and gave Plaintiff until September 2, 2019 to pay the filing fee #9 . The Court informed Plaintiff that if the fee was not paid, this case would be dismissed. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff still has not paid the filing fee, nor has she requested an extension of time to do so. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice, and all pending motions #5 are terminated as moot.Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied. Plaintiff is granted until September 2, 2019, to pay the filing fee or this case will be dismissed. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 8/12/2019. Mailed notice. (sxb, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kb, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Nicole Weston for attorney representation. (kb, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nicole Weston for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (kb, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Nicole Weston. (kb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (kb, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Nicole Weston (Exhibits). (kb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Weston v. Dyson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicole Weston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joycelyn Dyson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
