Komar et al v. The Boeing Company
Plaintiff: EPI SAMSUL KOMAR and DIAN ANDRIANI
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv05217
Filed: August 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Durkin
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Airplane Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court orders all individual related actions, 19 C 5220, 19 C 2315, 19 C 2764, 19 C 3415, 19 C 4589, 19 C 2074, 19 C 4897, 19 C 5311, 19 C 5213, 19 C 5211, 19 C 5214, 19 C 5215, and 19 C 5217 to be consolidated under case number 18 C 7686. This order will be implemented by the Clerk of Court submitting JS-6 forms to the Administrative Office for the individual related actions. This will designate the individual related actions as closed for administrative and statistical purposes. This order will not be considered a dismissal or disposition of these actions on the merits. All future pleadings are to be filed in the consolidated case alone. No pleadings should be filed in any of the individual related actions which are to be administratively closed. Any additional related cases filed in the future and assigned to Judge Durkin will also be administratively closed and consolidated with this case. Should any party believe at any point in the future that separate proceedings become necessary for that party's particular claims, the party should make a motion in the consolidated case 18 C 7686 seeking relief. The Clerk is also directed to transfer all attorney appearances in the individual related actions to case 18 C 7686. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/30/2019. Mailed notice. (sxb, )
August 21, 2019 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 10/3/2019 at 1:30 PM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 9/26/2019. Mailed notice (rj, )
August 20, 2019 Filing 10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings. Honorable Sara L. Ellis no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/20/19. (kp, )
August 12, 2019 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Epi Samsul Komar. The Boeing Company waiver sent on 8/7/2019, answer due 10/7/2019. (Scharg, Ari)
August 6, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Dian Andriani, Epi Samsul Komar by Jay Edelson (Edelson, Jay)
August 6, 2019 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Dian Andriani, Epi Samsul Komar by Rafey S. Balabanian (Balabanian, Rafey)
August 6, 2019 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Dian Andriani, Epi Samsul Komar by Benjamin Harris Richman (Richman, Benjamin)
August 2, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, )
August 2, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, )
August 1, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs DIAN ANDRIANI, EPI SAMSUL KOMAR by Ari Jonathan Scharg (Scharg, Ari)
August 1, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Scharg, Ari)
August 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by EPI SAMSUL KOMAR, DIAN ANDRIANI; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16097060.(Scharg, Ari)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Komar et al v. The Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EPI SAMSUL KOMAR
Represented By: Ari Jonathan Scharg
Represented By: Benjamin Harris Richman
Represented By: Jay Edelson
Represented By: Rafey S. Balabanian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DIAN ANDRIANI
Represented By: Ari Jonathan Scharg
Represented By: Benjamin Harris Richman
Represented By: Jay Edelson
Represented By: Rafey S. Balabanian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?