Cohan v. Citygate Centre Hotel, LLC
| Howard Cohan |
| CITYGATE CENTRE HOTEL, LLC |
| 1:2019cv05376 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Citygate Centre Hotel, LLC by Katherine Ann Rodosky (Rodosky, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Howard Cohan regarding Summons and complaint served on William Takahashi on 09/26/2019 (Spears, Angela) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The docket does not reflect that summons has been served. Accordingly, the status hearing set for 9/26/2019 #5 is stricken and re-set for 10/30/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff is reminded of the requirements of Civil Rule 4(m).Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Citygate Centre Hotel, LLC. (acm, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 9/26/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spears, Angela) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Cohan by Angela Corinne Spears (Spears, Angela) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Howard Cohan; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16121124.(Spears, Angela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Citygate Centre Hotel, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Angela Corinne Spears |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITYGATE CENTRE HOTEL, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Ann Rodosky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
