Flores v. DG Retail, LLC.
| Abdias Flores |
| DG Retail, LLC., d/b/a Dollar General, Kaiyah King, individually, DG Retail, LLC. and Kaiyah King |
| 1:2019cv05670 |
| August 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Initial status hearing set for 10/31/19 at 9:00 a.m. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Abdias Flores by Samuel David Engelson (Engelson, Samuel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Abdias Flores by John William Billhorn (Billhorn, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Billhorn, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ABDIAS FLORES on behalf of himself, and all other plaintiffs similarly situated, known and unknown, v. DG RETAIL, LLC., d/b/a DOLLAR GENERAL and KAIYAH KING, individually filed by Abdias Flores; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16167152. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Plaintiff Abdias Flores)(Billhorn, John) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
