Hanks et al v. Rueda et al
Theorthe Hanks |
Robert Esparza, James Mendrick, Elgin Autoplex, Edgar Rueda, J Pochowicz and Bob Esparza |
1:2019cv05688 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert W Gettleman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Theorthe Hanks regarding summons served on Edgar Rueda on 9/13/19 (Weinberg, Michelle) |
Filing 6 PRO SE Appearance by Defendant Robert Esparza (rp, ) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Theorthe Hanks. J Pochowicz waiver sent on 8/28/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Weinberg, Michelle) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Theorthe Hanks. James Mendrick waiver sent on 8/28/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Weinberg, Michelle) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Robert Esparza, Edgar Rueda (jn, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Theorthe Hanks by Michelle Ann Weinberg (Weinberg, Michelle) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Weinberg, Michelle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Theorthe Hanks; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16169394. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBITS TO COMPLAINT)(Weinberg, Michelle) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Max D. Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.