Haddad v. McAleenan et al
| Suad Haddad |
| Attorney General William Barr, Acting Director Kenneth T Cuccinelli, U.S. Attorney, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, Director Martha Medina-Maltes, Martha Medina-Maltes, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, United States of America, William Barr and Kevin McAleenan |
| 1:2019cv05805 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman and is set for a status hearing on 11/1/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are reminded to review the timelines set out in this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Barr, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, Martha Medina-Maltes, United States of America (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Barr, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, Martha Medina-Maltes, United States of America (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bartos, Sara) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Suad Haddad by Sara Judith Bartos (Bartos, Sara) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bartos, Sara) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Further Relief filed by Suad Haddad; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16186775. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Bartos, Sara) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants William Barr, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, Martha Medina-Maltes, U.S. Attorney (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
