Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC
| Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC |
| Phillip Timothy Howard, Howard and Associates, P.A. and Jeff Kahn |
| 1:2019cv06245 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant Phillip Timothy Howard to supplement (Howard, Phillip) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Amy Galvin Grogan for presentment of motion to strike #16 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/9/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Grogan, Amy) |
| Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC to strike answer to complaint #14 Strike Kahn's Affirmative Defenses (Grogan, Amy) |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT filed by Defendants Phillip Timothy Howard, Howard and Associates, P.A. regarding Motion to Dismiss; Motion for a more Definite Statement; and Motion to Strike. (Howard, Phillip) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's on 11/12/2019 (jh, ). |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Jeff Kahn (lma, ) |
| Filing 13 LETTER from Jeff Kahn dated 10/30/2019. (lma, ) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE by Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLCin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Howard and Associates, P.A. to dismiss #9 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Grogan, Amy) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A&B, #2 Certificate of Service)(Grogan, Amy) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss #8 and #9 . Response due by 11/7/2019. Reply due by 11/14/2019. Status hearing set for 1/9/2020 at 9:00 AM. Initial Status hearing set for 12/9/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Howard and Associates, P.A. to dismiss (Howard, Phillip) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Phillip Timothy Howard (Howard, Phillip) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC as to Jeff Kahn on 10/1/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. (Grogan, Amy) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 10/9/2019 (lma, ). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC as to Howard and Associates, P.A. on 10/1/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. (Grogan, Amy) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 10/9/2019 (lma, ). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC as to Phillip Timothy Howard on 10/1/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. (Grogan, Amy) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 10/9/2019 (lma, ). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC regarding summons issued Howard and Assoc., P.A. (Grogan, Amy) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 12/9/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 12/3/2019. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Phillip Timothy Howard, Howard and Associates, P.A., Jeff Kahn (mc, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Preferred Capital Funding of Nevada, LLC; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16252048. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 & 2, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Disclosure Statement, #4 Ex A to Disc Stmt)(Grogan, Amy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B.Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
