Roor International BV et al v. Lakeview Smoke & Vape Inc. et al
| RooR International BV, Sream, Inc and Sream, Inc. |
| Lakeview Smoke & Vape, Inc., Airaf Jaliawala and Lakeview Smoke & Vape Inc. |
| 1:2019cv06489 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Plaintiff's request to reset status hearing #7 is granted. Status hearing is reset from 11/14/2019 to 1/8/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Joint status report is due by 1/6/2020. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 7 Reqeust to Re-Set November 14th Initial Status by Roor International BV, Sream, Inc. (Langone, Christopher) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Airaf Jaliawala (ng, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Lakeview Smoke & Vape Inc. (ng, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 11/14/2019 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials (pk, ) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment)(pk, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs RooR International BV, Sream, Inc by Christopher V. Langone (Langone, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by RooR International BV, Sream, Inc; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16288746. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. USPTO- Notice of Recordation of Assignment, #2 Exhibit B. RooR Trademark Registrations, #3 Exhibit C. License Agreement, #4 Exhibit D. Agreement Scream Roor international, #5 Exhibit E. Product Purchase from Defendant, #6 Exhibit PI report, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Langone, Christopher) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
