Cullotta v. United Surgical Parnters International, Inc. et al
| Donald J Cullotta |
| Catherine Weaver, United Surgical Parnters International, Inc. and Christopher Hartshorn |
| 1:2019cv06490 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead [Dckt. No. #9 ] is hereby granted. Defendants shall file an answer or motion to dismiss by January 10, 2020. The motion hearing set for Nov. 20, 2019 is stricken. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Motion by Michael Vincent Furlong for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, #9 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 11/20/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Furlong, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION by Defendants Christopher Hartshorn, United Surgical Parnters International, Inc., Catherine Weaver for extension of time to file answer - DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD - (Furlong, Michael)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Christopher Hartshorn, United Surgical Parnters International, Inc., Catherine Weaver by Michael Vincent Furlong (Furlong, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Christopher Hartshorn, United Surgical Parnters International, Inc., Catherine Weaver by Jennifer L Colvin (Colvin, Jennifer)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Catherine Weaver (rc, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Christopher Hartshorn, United Surgical Parnters International, Inc. (lma, )
|
|
Filing 6
FIRST AMENDED complaint by Donald J Cullotta against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 2 of 2-Amended Complaint)(Luetkehans, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Donald J Cullotta by Brian J. Armstrong (Armstrong, Brian)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Donald J Cullotta by Matthew Ryan Custardo, Y (Custardo, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Donald J Cullotta by Phillip Anthony Luetkehans (Luetkehans, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Donald J Cullotta; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16288753. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luetkehans, Phillip)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
