Bergman v. Cook County et al
| Corshon Bergman |
| COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS J. DART, Cook County, Cook County Corrections Officer Scott and Thomas Dart |
| 1:2019cv06671 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Defendants' unopposed motion to extend time #11 is granted to 12/23/19. Initial status hearing previously set for 11/26/19 is stricken and reset to 1/7/20 at 9:30 a.m. Motion hearing date of 10/29/19 is stricken. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, ) |
| Filing 12 unopposed NOTICE of Motion by Bianca B. Brown for presentment of extension of time #11 before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 10/29/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Brown, Bianca) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendants Cook County, Thomas Dart for extension of time (Brown, Bianca) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Cook County Corrections Officer Scott. Cook County Corrections Officer Scott waiver sent on 10/24/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Brown, Bianca) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Thomas Dart by Bianca B. Brown (Brown, Bianca) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Bianca B. Brown (Brown, Bianca) |
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing set for 11/26/19 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Corshon Bergman as to Cook County on 10/18/2019, answer due 11/8/2019. (Foutris, Basileios) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Corshon Bergman as to Thomas Dart on 10/18/2019, answer due 11/8/2019. (Foutris, Basileios) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Thomas Dart (ng, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cook County (ng, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cook County Corrections Officer Scott (ng, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Corshon Bergman by Basileios John Foutris (Foutris, Basileios) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Foutris, Basileios) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Corshon Bergman; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16318556.(Foutris, Basileios) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
