Teamsters Local Union No. 705 v. L. Neill Cartage Co., Inc. et al
| Teamsters Local Union No. 705 |
| T.R.N. Transportation, Inc., L.Neill Cartage Co., Inc. and L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc. |
| 1:2019cv07176 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 09 U.S.C. § 1 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Motion hearing held. Pursuant to the discussion held in open court, Defendants' motion to vacate and/or modify the grievance panel award and for time to submit memoranda in support #15 is granted in part. Defendants' memorandum of law with exhibits shall be filed by 1/15/2020. Status hearing set for 1/8/2020 #7 is stricken and reset for 1/30/2020 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Motion by Donald Joseph Vogel for presentment of motion to vacate, #15 before Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 12/10/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Vogel, Donald)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION by Defendants L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc., T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. to vacate and/or Modify the Grievance Panel Award and for Time to Submit Memoranda in Support (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Hearing Transcript 09.11.19, #2 Exhibit B - Charge No. 13-CA-248943, #3 Exhibit C - Charge No. 13-CA-243920)(Vogel, Donald)
|
|
Filing 14
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Teamsters Local Union No. 705 by Alexis Malcolm Tillett-saks (Tillett-saks, Alexis)
|
|
Filing 13
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc., T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. by Michael David Reed (Reed, Michael)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc., T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. by Caroline D. Pratt (Pratt, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc., T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. by Sara L Pettinger (Pettinger, Sara)
|
|
Filing 10
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc., T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. by Donald Joseph Vogel (Vogel, Donald)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Teamsters Local Union No. 705 as to T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (Parker, Khristian)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Teamsters Local Union No. 705 as to L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc. on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (Parker, Khristian)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Initial status hearing set for 1/8/2020 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants L. Neill Cartae Co., Inc., and T.R.N. Transportation, Inc. (acm, )
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM complaint #1 by Teamsters Local Union No. 705 Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion to Enforce (Parker, Khristian)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Teamsters Local Union No. 705 by Khristian Gervais Parker (Parker, Khristian)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Parker, Khristian)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Teamsters Local Union No. 705; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16394446. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Parker, Khristian)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
