Republic Technologies (NA) LLC et al v. Smoke Shop for you XX, INC. et al
| SREAM, INC., Republic Technologies (NA) LLC and Sream, Inc |
| HAMD Kamal, SMOKE SHOP FOR YOU XX, INC. d/b/a SMOKE SHOP PIPES & STUFF and Smoke Shop for you XX, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv08462 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the 03/26/2020 Rule 4(m) deadline for service, the status hearing of 02/11/2020 is reset to 04/01/2020 at 9:30 a.m., with another status report due on 03/26/2020. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 9 STATUS Report (by Plaintiffs only) by Republic Technologies (NA) LLC, Sream, Inc (Langone, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 02/11/2020 at 9:00 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (td, ) |
| Filing 6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings. Honorable Marvin E. Aspen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/7/2020. (td, ) |
| Filing 5 E-MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials (las, ) |
| Filing 4 E-MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (Attachments: #1 exhibits)(las, ) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Republic Technologies (NA) LLC, SREAM, INC. (Langone, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Republic Technologies (NA) LLC, SREAM, INC. by Christopher V. Langone (Langone, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Republic Technologies (NA) LLC, SREAM, INC.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16567976. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Langone, Christopher) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ecw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
