Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Escorza Tile Incorporated et al
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund |
Celso Escorza and Escorza Tile Incorporated |
1:2020cv01748 |
March 12, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Agreed Motion for Order of Dismissal (Dckt. No. #13 ) is hereby granted. In light of the settlement, this case is dismissed without prejudice with leave to reinstate on or before September 30, 2020. The dismissal shall automatically convert to dismissal with prejudice unless a party seeks and obtains relief from the Court by September 30, 2020. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 14 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs re MOTION by Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Regional Co #13 (McAnally, Daniel) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund for order of dismissal (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(McAnally, Daniel) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The parties emailed to the Courtroom Deputy a pdf of an agreed order of dismissal. The submission does not comply with the Federal Rules or this Court's Standing Orders. First, the proposed order does not comply with Rule 41. If the parties want dismissal by court order, then Rule 41(a)(2) requires a motion. Alternatively, Rule 41(a)(1) (A) allows for dismissal without court order, under certain conditions. Second, the Court requires parties to submit proposed orders in Word, not in pdf. The reason for that requirement is that it enable the Court to change (as necessary), sign, and file the document. A pdf does not suffice. Finally, only the Court signs Court orders, so the signatures from counsel are unnecessary on the Order itself. The signatures of counsel on the motion show the consent of the parties for the requested relief. In sum, for a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2), the parties must file a motion (signed by counsel for all parties) on the Court's docket, and must email a Word version of the proposed judgment to the Court's proposed order inbox. The Court directs the parties to resubmit their request by April 30, 2020. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
![]() |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund as to Celso Escorza on 4/13/2020, answer due 5/4/2020. (McAnally, Daniel) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund as to Escorza Tile Incorporated on 3/23/2020, answer due 4/13/2020. (McAnally, Daniel) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mc, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status hearing is set for June 3, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. At least two weeks before the hearing, the parties must discuss settlement in good faith, and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. The parties also must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court before the initial status hearing. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) by May 29, 2020. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. Second, the parties must submit a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Please note that the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report on the Court's docket, but must email (i.e., not file on the docket) the proposed Scheduling Order to the Court's proposed order inbox. The initial status hearing will be the scheduling conference contemplated by Rule 16(b). Lead counsel for the parties must participate in the initial status conference. Counsel must be prepared to discuss the status of settlement, as well as the proposed discovery plan. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process by one week before the initial status hearing, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status hearing. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund by Daniel P. McAnally (McAnally, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (McAnally, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Escorza Tile Incorporated, et al. filed by Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund; n. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16822068.(McAnally, Daniel) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Celso Escorza, Escorza Tile Incorporated, and Celso Escorza individually d/b/a Escorza Tile Incorporated. (acm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.