United States of America v. Ayala
| United States of America |
| Juan M Ayala |
| 1:2020cv01992 |
| March 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AGREEMENT for Judgment.Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/13/2020:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION and Request for Entry of Agreed Judgment (Stallings, Mary) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by United States of America. Juan M Ayala waiver sent on 4/6/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Stallings, Mary) |
Filing 4
ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket4, )
|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff United States of America by Mary A. Stallings (Stallings, Mary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Juan M Ayala (tg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by United States of America; (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stallings, Mary) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Ayala | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Juan M Ayala | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Mary A. Stallings |
| Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
