Lashley v. Emanuel et al
| Louis Lashley |
| Kim Fox, Robert D. Vanna, Sharon M. Huffman, Lorri Lightfoot, K.D Hatten, L.D Vanghan, Rahm Emanuel, Eddie T. Johnson and City of Chicago |
| 1:2020cv03893 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Amended Complaint and no copies by Louis Lashley. (Envelope postmarked 8/13/2020) (lma, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time #7 is granted. Plaintiff shall have until September 18, 2020 to file an amended complaint. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 8/12/2020. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Louis Lashley for extension of time. (Envelope post marked 7/23/20) (nsf, ) |
| MAILED Plaintiff an amended civil rights complaint form, a blank USM-285 form and instructions, and a copy of the order dated 7/14/2020 (mc, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER : Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $26.17 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund supervisor at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration and the Court's Fiscal Department. However, summons shall not issue. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to submit a proposed amended complaint on the Court''s required form, see N.D. Ill. L.R. 81.1, and a completed USM-285 (Marshals service) form for each Defendant named therein, by August 14, 2020, will result in dismissal of this matter. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a Court order and for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an amended civil rights complaint form, a blank USM-285 form and instructions, and a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 7/14/2020. Mailed notice(mc, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Louis Lashley for attorney assistance. (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Louis Lashley to proceed without prepaying fees or costs/financial affidavit. (Attachments) (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Louis Lashley. (Envelope not postmarked) (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
