Rich v. Gee et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Rich
Defendant: Newey, John Doe, Barnes, Witt, Miles and Gee
Case Number: 1:2020cv03910
Filed: June 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Kendall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2020 MAILED Copy of Order dated 8/26/20, three blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions to Plaintiff. (aee, )
August 27, 2020 SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 08/26/2020 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to defendant Gee, Newey, Witt via email. (aee, )
August 26, 2020 Filing 11 COMPLAINT filed by Anthony Rich. (Envelope not postmarked)(aee, )
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiff has paid the filing fee for this action 9 . Plaintiff may proceed on his complaint #1 on those claims and against those Defendants as set forth below. The Clerk of Court is directed to: (1) file the complaint #1 ; (2) issue summonses for service of the complaint #1 on Defendants Gee, Witt, and Newey by the U.S. Marshal; (3) terminate Defendants Barnes and Miles; and (4) send Plaintiff three blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. The Court advises Plaintiff that a completed USM-285 form for each Defendant is required for service. The U.S. Marshal will not attempt service on a Defendant unless and until the required form is received. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to serve Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/26/2020. Mailed notice (aee, )
July 21, 2020 Filing 8 LETTER from Anthony Rich dated 7/15/20. (Envelope postmarked 7/16/20) (aee, )
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 #4 is denied for lack of a sufficient showing of indigence. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this case, he must pre-pay the $400.00 filing fee by July 31, 2020. Failure to do so will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court defers screening of Plaintiff's complaint #1 pending payment of the filing fee. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 7/9/2020. Mailed notice (aee, )
June 30, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Anthony Rich for attorney representation. (aee, )
June 30, 2020 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Anthony Rich for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (aee, )
June 30, 2020 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Anthony Rich for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (aee, )
June 30, 2020 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, )
June 30, 2020 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Anthony Rich. (Envelope not postmarked) (aee, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rich v. Gee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Newey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Witt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Rich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?